After my last post, a lot of replies assumed anyone with a good life in India must be in the "top 0.01%", or that India is basically slums and poverty. I'm not denying poverty. India still has hundreds of millions of poor people, and per-person income is far below the UK's. But that's only part of the picture:
India's economy overtook the UK's in 2022 and is one of the biggest in the world.
It has close to a million dollar millionaires and a middle class in the hundreds of millions. That's several times the UK's entire population, so "top 0.01%" doesn't really add up.
Indian-born CEOs run Google, Microsoft, Adobe and IBM.
Indian companies own Jaguar Land Rover and Tetley.
India was the first country to land near the moon's south pole, in 2023.
It runs the world's biggest real-time digital payments system. People pay for chai with a QR code.
Here in the UK, British Indians are consistently among the highest-earning ethnic groups.
Both things are true at once: huge poverty and a huge, comfortable middle class. Britain has food banks and a City full of millionaires too.
And people move for all sorts of reasons: careers, study, relationships, adventure. They're the same reasons thousands of Brits move to Dubai, Australia or Spain every year, and nobody assumes they were fleeing poverty. Brits abroad get called "expats". Indians here get told they "came for a better life".
So I'm genuinely curious: where does the "India = poor" picture come from? Films? Charity adverts? History lessons that stop in 1947? And why does the "better life" assumption stick to Indians, but not to Americans or Australians moving here?